President George W. Bush seeks to Fulfill His Destiny and Legacy
Gogu-Magog War completes its Seventh Year (2007-8)
By Robert Mock M.D.
It was on January 10, 2007, that the President of the United States addressed the nation from the Oval Office and announced to this nation, in the face of the deteriorating conditions of the War in Iraq that he was committing an additional “surge” of 21,500 troops to the land of Iraq. He also pledged the institution of a jobs program for the Iraqi people, to include additional construction projects and the funding for these programs with $1.2 billion US dollars. During this same time, the world geo-political scene was dominated by four national rulers; the United States President George W. Bush, the Prime Minister of Great Britain Tony Blair, the President of Russia Vladimir Putin and the President of China Hu Jintao. Each of these leaders had a legacy that they wished to leave for posterity. All four were contenders in the bid for world domination. Bush and Blair represented the Western Occidental nations called by Pope John Paul II as the Golden Internationale, the world economic powerhouse of internationalists and transnationalists. At the same time, Putin and Jintao represented the Eastern Oriental nations recognized also by John Paul II as the world globalist leaders of the Red Internationale, the global contenders of the Red Communist Leninist-Marxist governments.
Prime Minister Tony Blair stepped down from his post as prime minister on June 27, 2007, four days after informing Pope Benedict XVI of his intention of converting from his Anglican faith to Catholicism. On the day he stepped down, he was appointed as the official Envoy of the Quartet on the Middle East representing the United Nations, the European Union, the United States and Russia. The Russian President Vladimir Putin stepped down from his post as the president of Russia on May 7, 2008 and the next day, was nominated by his successor, President Dmitry Medvedev to be Russia’s Prime Minister on May 8, 2008.
Today, of these four, only Presidents George W. Bush of the United States and President Hu Jintao remain as their nation’s leaders. On the eve of the 2008 Beijing Olympics, for those with “eyes that can see” were able to perceive that these two nations were locked in a global conflict using exotic weapons of mass destruction that were so secret that most of their citizens refused to believe that they even existed. Both were also sharing the stake for dominion in the Middle East; Bush leading the western globalists to isolate Shi’ite Iran’s bid to become the premier nuclear powered Islamic nation in the Middle East. Jintao was leading the opposition to the western globalist’s control of oil rich Middle East and was leading the charge to convert the sale of international oil away from the American dollar. It was his intent to destroy the power of the American dollar by dumping their vast hoard of $1 trillion US dollars upon the world economic market. This economic “play” was destined to backfire as most of China’s foreign reserves were in US dollars. Both of these rulers were prime contenders in the stake of bringing their nation the “trophy” of being the strongest and powerful nation on this planet earth.
It was on December 11, 2006, that Bill Wilson with Watch Organization who posed the question, “Has One World Order Group Taken Control Of U.S. Foreign Policy?”
Koenig International News - The globalist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) may now be in full control of American foreign policy as its members are shaping policy and events that impact the international stage. During his Senate confirmation hearing, Robert Gates, the Bush Administration’s nominee for Secretary of Defense and a member of the CFR, for the first time broke a longstanding 40 year agreement of ambiguity between Israel and the United States by confirming Israel had nuclear weapons. In addition, Gates said that no one can promise that Iran will not use nuclear weapons against Israel—a statement interpreted by many as indicating the United States would sit on the sidelines rather than protect Israel.
The second coup de tat of the CFR is the Iraq Study Group Report. Hailed by liberals and terrorists as a long-awaited “I told you so,” the report called for negotiations with terrorist sponsors Syria and Iran and the tying together of the Palestinian issue with the Iraq war. The report left the strong impression that Israel was at the center of the entire Middle East unrest and that America should be negotiating with Israel’s enemies rather than supporting Israel. The leaders of the Iraq Study Group—James Baker and Lee Hamilton—are both members of the CFR. Baker has gone so far as suggesting a Middle East peace negotiation in Madrid, Spain with Arab enemies of Israel, without Israel’s participation.
Meantime, President Bush appears to be backing away from the suggestions of the Iraq Study Group to have direct talks with Syria and Iran. He has said that there will be no discussions with Iran until it stops its nuclear enrichment nor with Syria until it stops trying to overthrow the government in Lebanon. But key Council on Foreign Relations members in policy-driving positions may overtake the President’s opposition as they continue to shape events. For example, CFR member and long time advisor to presidents, Brent Scowcroft reportedly emerged as a mover and shaker behind the Iraq Study Group report. He is a mentor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, also a member of the CFR.”
For those interested in biblical prophecy would also be fascinated with the observation that of all the nations and organization on this earth, which one has risen to take the mantle of the White Horse and Rider of the 1st Seal of the Jewish prophetic book of Revelation? As can be seen in the signature logo of the flagship news magazine of the Council of Foreign Relations, “Foreign Affairs”, the “white horse and rider” is the signature that seals every council meeting portfolio as the CFR sits in session. As we watch the emergence and the resurrection of the World Federation of Nations, we also must watch the activities of the most powerful promoters of this One World Order; the American Council on Foreign Relations and the European Bilderbergs.
It was on January 10, 2007 that George Bush, the President of America gave his long-awaited speech on how to solve the problems in Iraq. Many, especially the Democrats, felt that he did not listen to the crescendo in the cry of the American public to pull the American troops away from the hot-bed of insurgency in a war that America was beginning to feel could not be won. According to the Washington Post, in the article “With Iraq Speech, Bush to Pull Away From His Generals” it began with the initial sentence:
Washington Post - “When President Bush goes before the American people tonight to outline his new strategy for Iraq, he will be doing something he has avoided since the invasion of Iraq in March 2003: ordering his top military brass to take action they initially resisted and advised against.”
A man of his own and many times in his life going alone in his own decision, staking the legacy of his entire presidency on his “convictions.” With the Iraq security crisis beginning to deteriorate with the American casualties rising exponentially, Bush went to the American public and proposed a plan “to add up to 20,000 troops to the 132,000 U.S. service members already on the ground….with the goal for the military to soon be "surging" in Iraq.
From Pentagon insiders and military circles, members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff along with the head of Central Command, General John P. Abizaid were concerned that adding additional American troops was not the answer. This was the first dissent with the military since the spring of 2003 when General Eric K. Shinseki, the Army chief of staff split with the administration on the size of the planned “occupation force” in Iraq.
This most recent decision by the Joint Chiefs of Staff was no doubt affected by the fate of the November 2006 election when the Democratic Party took control of the Congress and the Senate. It was also affected by the embattled Shi’ite Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in the Amman, Jordan summit on November 30, 2006 when he advised that the United States should lower its profile and not raise it in Iraq. Behind this advice was the knowledge that the al-Maliki was loosing his Islamic support by the followers of the radical Islamic cleric, Moqtada Sadr’s Mehdi Army militia. The message that Al-Maliki gave Bush in Amman was that he wanted to take the lead and put an Iraqi face on it. He wanted to control his own forces."
Within days, the Iraq Study Group, the prestigious bipartisan panel led by the former secretary of state James A. Baker III, a Republican, and the former Democratic congressman Lee H. Hamilton (D-Ind.) delivered their recommendations; dialogue on a high level profile with Iran and Syria, set a goal of early 2008 for the removal most of the American troops, link the destiny of Iraqi insurgency with the Israeli-Palestinian State impasse, offer the Syrians the “carrot” of receiving back the strategic military pass of the Golan Heights from Israel for there “full adherence” and “full cooperation” with the United Nations. The debate over the fate and the sovereignty of the Nation of Israel was seen by James Baker III to be not in the hands of the Jewish people but in the hands of the president of the United States.
Here we raise our “spiritual eyes” to the heavens where the Almighty One of Israel reigns. It was the Psalmist who wrote in the era of King David:
Psalms 2:1-6 – “Why do the nations rage and the people plot a vain thing?
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord and against His Anointed saying,
“Let us break Their Bonds in pieces and cast away Their cords from us,”
He who sits in the heavens shall laugh; The Lord shall hold them in derision.
Then He shall speak to them in His wrath, and distress them in His deep displeasure:
“Yet I have set My King, on My holy Hill of Zion.”
For those Christians who proclaim that Jesus Christ has abandoned His own people the Jews and proclaim their church or religious identity to be the “chosen ones” must take pause. It was the Psalmist who proclaimed that the future messiah of Israel would be the proclaimed “Son” of the God of Israel. This would be the “Son” that would be “begotten” on this day. He would be given the “nations for His inheritance,” and teach these nations the pathway of Torah and submission to His Father with the “Rod of Iron.” It would be the same Yahshua HaMaschiach (Jesus the Messiah) that ascended to His Father and will return in “clouds of great glory.” The reign of the messiah’s kingdom will be over the literal nations of this earth. It will not be a “kingdom” in another planetary dimension while this planet earth is smoldering in the ashes of complete annihilation but the literal “kingdom of God on this planet earth.”
Psalms 2:7-12 – “I will declare the decree:
The Lord has said to Me, You are My Son, Today I have begotten You.
Ask of Me, and I will give You the nations for Your inheritance,
And the ends of the earth for Your possession.
You shall break them with a rod of iron;
You shall dash them to pieces like a potter’s vessel.”
Not therefore, be wise, O kings; be instructed, you judges of the earth.
Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest He be angry,
And you perish in the way, when His wrath is kindled but a little.
Blessed are all those who put their trust in Him.”
So the nations of the world are now “raging” against Israel and thereby “raging” against the God of Israel. The “kings of the earth” and the “rulers” are taking counsel in the United Nations against the Almighty One of Israel and His “Chosen Ones.” If anyone wonders why the world is progressively becoming more distressed as chaos reigns around this globe, we invite you to “open” your “spiritual eyes” and see the finger of the God of Israel slowly bringing the nations of this planet to await the coming of the Messiah at Megiddo.
It was on December 6, 2006 that the “prestigious” Iraq Study Group, better known as the Baker-Hamilton Group, presented its official Recommendations. The premises of the study group in reaching its conclusions according to DEBKAfiles in the article titled “Baker-Hamilton Group Seeks Israel’s Return of Golan for a Secure Peace with Syria” were as follows:
· “There is no military solution to this conflict.
· The vast majority of the Israeli body politic is tired of perpetual war.
· No American administration – Democratic or Republican – will ever abandon Israel.
· Political engagement and dialogue are essential in the Arab-Israeli dispute.
· The only basis for peace is that set forth in the UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338 and in the principle of “land for peace.”
· The only lasting and secure peace will be a negotiated peace.
· This effort would strongly support moderate Arab governments in the region, especially the democratically elected government of Lebanon and the Palestinian Authority under President Mahmoud Abbas.
Out of these premises arose five major recommendations:
1. “Recommendation 13: There must be a renewed and sustained commitment by the US to a comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace on all fronts: Lebanon and Syria, and President Bush’s June 2002 commitment to a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine.
2. Recommendation 14: This effort should include – as soon as possible – the unconditional calling and holding of meetings under US or Quartet auspices between Israel and Lebanon and Syria on the one hand, and Israel and the Palestinians (who acknowledge Israel’s right to exist) on the other. The purpose of these meetings would be to negotiate peace as was done at the Madrid Conference in 1991.
3. Recommendation 15: Concerning Syria, some elements should be:
· Syria’s full adherence to UN Security Council Resolution 1701 of Aug 2006 which provides the framework for Lebanon to regain sovereign control over its territory.
· Syria’s full cooperation with all investigations into political assassinations in Lebanon, especially Rafiq Hariri and Pierre Gemayel.
· A verifiable cessation of Syrian aid to Hizballah and the use of Syrian territory for transshipment of Iranian weapons and aid to Hizballah.
· Syria’s use of its influence with Hamas and Hizballah for the release of the captured IDF soldiers.
· A verifiable cessation of Syrian efforts to undermine the democratically elected government of Lebanon.
· A verifiable cessation of arms shipments from or transiting through Syria for Hamas and other radical Palestinian groups.
· A Syrian commitment to help obtain from Hamas an acknowledgment of Israel’s right to exist.
· Greater Syrian efforts to seal its border with Iraq.
4. Recommendation 16: In exchange for these actions and in the context of a full and secure peace agreement, the Israelis should return the Golan Heights, with a US security guarantee for Israel that could include an international force on the border, including US troops if requested by both parties.
5. Recommendation 17: Concerning the Palestinian issue, elements of that negotiated peace should include:
· Adherence to UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338 and the principle of land for peace which are the only bases for achieving peace.
· Strong support for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and the PA to take the lead in preparing the way for negotiations with Israel.
· A major effort to move from current hostilities by consolidating the cease-fire reached between the Palestinians and Israelis in November 2006.
· Support of a Palestinian national unity government.”
Siding with the handful of “hawks” on Capital Hill along with Neo-Conservative think tanks, Bush, whom many described as “relatively passive” about questioning advice of his military advisors, moved with increasing assertiveness in defining his own political destiny and the future of his presidential legacy. Associated with this new assertiveness was also the rising clamor that Bush’s legacy was being decided by his small but powerful select group of advisors called the NeoCons, largely controlled by “Jewish” advisors. This fact may loom significantly in the future final drama when Bush’s legacy is finally over.
According to World Net Daily’s Jerusalem Bureau on December 6, 2007, in the article titled, “Terrorists rejoicing over new Iraq 'plan' - Reaction to Study Group: 'Allah and his angels' responsible, 'era of Islam and of jihad” it declared:
World Net Daily – "The report proves that this is the era of Islam and of jihad," said Abu Ayman, a senior leader of Islamic Jihad in the northern West Bank town of Jenin…"[With the Iraq Study Group report], the Americans came to the conclusion that Islam is the new giant of the world and it would be clever to reduce hostilities with this giant. In the Quran the principle of the rotation is clear and according to this principle the end of the Americans and of all non-believers is getting closer," Abu Ayman said.
According to Abu Abdullah, a senior leader of Hamas' so-called military wing, Baker's report is a victory for Islam brought about by "Allah and his angels….It is not just a simple victory. It is a great one. The big superpower of the world is defeated by a small group of mujahedeen (fighters)… exclaimed Abu Abdullah, who is considered one of the most important operational members of Hamas' Izzedine al-Qassam Martyrs Brigades, Hamas' declared "resistance" department...Abu Abdullah said following a withdrawal from Iraq, the U.S. will be defeated on its own soil. America must understand that with anti-American governments in Latin America and with Islam growing and reinforcing, including in the U.S. itself, the next step would be a total defeat on their (American) land, not a relative one like they are facing in Iraq," he said.
Yet the rejoicing did not last long. The military “surge” did in fact begin to work within months. The highly acclaimed Israeli intelligence newsletter called Debkafiles posted on January 10, 2007, the following article, “President Bush’s new Iraq plan highlights security in Baghdad vows “to seek out and destroy” networks Iran and Syria allows to attack US forces from their territory” highlighted the following in the high-stakes drama of tension, as the highly strained president spoke to the American public:
DEBKAfile: In the heart of his long-awaited speech, President Bush declared, “This begins with addressing Iran and Syria, “which allow terrorists and insurgents to use their territory to move in and out of Iraq.” He accused Iran of providing material support for attacks on American troops. “We will disrupt the attacks on our forces. We will interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria. We will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq.”
With the goal of reducing the heartland of sectarian violence, 80% of which is within “thirty miles of the capital” of Baghdad, he proclaimed, “Our military commanders report that the new plan ensures past mistakes… and can work.”…” The Iraqi government will appoint a military commander and two deputy commanders for the capital, deploying Iraqi Army and national police brigades across its nine districts. Eighteen of these brigades will be committed…and “Iraqi and American forces will have a green light to enter these neighborhoods and Prime Minister Maliki has pledged that political or sectarian interference will not be tolerated.”
The geo-political events rolled with increasing speed. It marked a decision made even before the November elections but now with increasing aggressive and assertiveness. As one Washington intelligence insider reported, the “gloves were now off” highlighting the fact that in the future, there may be no stopping in what American forces will do to assure victory not only in Iraq but within the larger arena of Syria and Iraq. As DEBKAfiles proclaimed, “Bush was Poised to Stake His All on Iraqi Victory.”
“DEBKAfile’s military and Washington sources report that the new Bush policy will brook no look-in for Iran, Syria or Hizballah in Iraq’s affairs. Exceptionally offensive US military resources have been marshaled to bar any interference with the White House’s plans for Iraq. They will under the hand of the military command for instantaneous responses. To this end, the shakeup of military leaders the US president set in motion over the weekend moves into forward position one of the toughest and most hawkish US military leaders.
Adm. William J. Fallon, 62, hitherto supreme commander in the Pacific theater, takes over from Gen. John Abizaid as commander of the US central command which is in charge of the US fronts in Iraq, Afghanistan and against global terrorism. The admiral specializes in deploying large-scale navy, air and Marines forces simultaneously in different arenas.”
Harvard trained political scientist author, Jerome R. Corsi Ph.D., co-author of the book, “Showdown with Nuclear Iran” with Michael Evans and author of "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil," described U.S. Admiral William J. Fallon in the following article, “War with Iran is Imminent”:
Jerome R. Corsi Ph.D – “The transition of command from the Army to the Navy should be noted, especially with this much naval power concentrating in the Gulf. We should also note that Admiral Fallon has command experience in the 1991 Gulf War, where he commanded the Carrier Air Wing Eight on the USS Theodore Roosevelt during Operation Desert Storm. In 1995, he was the Commander of the U.S. Sixth Fleet battle force supporting NATO's Operation Deliberate Force in Bosnia. He is considered one of the Navy's top commanders in combined forces operations and an expert in amphibious landings.”
DEBKAfiles went on to describe the immense deployment of the U.S.S. John C. Stennis Strike Group along with the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan Strike Group to the Persian Gulf, Indian and western Pacific Ocean Regions. This was affirmed by the group’s commander, Rear Adm. Michael H. Miller, reiterated: “When we deploy for real-world operations, Carrier Strike Group 7 will be an example of how the Navy is able to carry out our mission any time, anywhere in the world.” In further observations:
“DEBKAfile’s military sources foresee these frenzied preparations as spelling a turbulent winter and spring for the region - critical for Iraq and fraught with tension for the rest of the Middle East. Israel might face extreme danger should Tehran and Damascus target the Jewish state in retaliation for US strikes. Israel is ruled by a volatile, shaky government; its military command under fire for its Lebanon War mistakes. Both may decide to take advantage of Israel’s low state. In fact US and Israeli military leaders do not rule out possible Iranian, Syrian or Hizballah assaults on the pretext that they are really aiming for US military installations in Israel. They may also direct their fire on American locations in Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and its fleet in the eastern Mediterranean.”
Quickly other military realignments were made in the high command of American military forces. Using his position as the Commander of the Armed Forces, Bush appointed another leading appointment with Lt. General David Petraeus, the former Commander of the 101st Airborne, called the “Screaming Eagles” in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Petraeus was appointed to the new Command of the American Armed Forces in Iraq replacing General George Casey. This elevated the “Screaming Eagles’” motto to match the new mood of the Commander in Chief, “Rendezvous with Destiny.” Then there came the appointment of Ryan Crocker who led the U.S. campaign in the Indian subcontinent against the al Qaeda and the Taliban, as the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq replacing Zamay Khalilzad who will be shifted to the U.S. Mission at the United Nations.
These swift events underscored the increasing willingness of President Bush to “go all the way in Iraq” that was “prompted by a simple line of reasoning. If it ends in victory, he will end his presidency on a high note and be able to boast that American doggedness and courage prevailed over the enemy in the long haul. If the US armed forces fail to deliver, Bush will be in exactly the same position as he is today, namely, heading for the history books as the American president who lost the Iraq war and the struggle against terror. He therefore has nothing to lose and everything to gain by staking his all on victory.”
Before President Bush even finished his speech, DEBKAfiles reported, the “Baghdad Battle No. 2 Has Begun”
DEBKAfiles – “Joint US-Iraqi forces were deep into their biggest operation ever to subdue the Iraqi capital forty-eight hours before US president George W. Bush formally unveiled his new Iraq plan on Wednesday January 10. The operation started out against “terrorist hideouts” in and around the Sunni stronghold of Haifa Street. Some 50 insurgents and jihadists were reported killed while fighting back with mortar and rocket-propelled grenade fire. “A great number of Arab nationals,” many of them Syrians, were detained, according to the Iraqi government. The second battle in four years for Baghdad, a city of nine million inhabitants, places American armed forces in active combat on three anti-al Qaeda fronts: Iraq, Somalia and Afghanistan.”
Aiming for the regions nearest to the Green Zone government U.S. command center on the southern bank of the Tigris River, the major haven of the former Sunni Baathist’s and al Qaeda’s were targeted. Key to the battles was to take over the critical Tigris Bridges of Tamuz and Jumhuriya plus three ancillary bridges. The purpose of the Baghdad battle mission was described as such by DEBKAfile’s exclusive military sources:
1. Once Haifa Street is purged, large-scale US and Iraqi forces will throw a steel ring around Baghdad in an effort to seal it off from the rest of Iraq, block its roads and entrances to incoming insurgent reinforcements and cut off their routes of escape.
2. Another force will head into the Shiite districts of Sadr City and Azamiyah, strongholds of the radical cleric Moqtada Sadr’s Mehdi Army militia, whose loyalists are riding high after taking charge of the Saddam Hussein execution on Dec. 30.
3. A third force will head south to Sunni insurgent bastions in the Baghdad district of Dura.
Estimated to take three months, the combined Iraqi-US campaign was to “cleanse the Iraqi capital of militias, death squads, terrorists and insurgents and provide a measure of stability that will in the process reduce much of Baghdad to a war zone for the foreseeable future.” The Medhi Army of the cleric Moqtada Sadr quickly went underground, redressed in civilian clothes and melt into the larger Baghdadi society. They also put their armaments in hiding for a future day, when they could re-activate the militia and battle to take over again parts of Baghdad. Three years earlier they were routed by the US led forces backed by Kurdish commandos that ended in the Shi’ite militia force being uprooted from the holy Shi’ite shrine cities south of Baghdad. This time they disappeared.
In the meantime the Sadrist parliamentary bloc of 30 along with its six ministers ended their two-month boycott (January 21) allowing the PM al-Maliki to assist in the U.S. led Baghdad crackdown plus saving the Mahdi Army from being targeted in their strongholds in Sadr City. Cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s spokesman, Sheik Mahmoud El Hassani, also ordered 20,000 Sunni Palestinians to leave the country or face death with these words, “They lived off our blood under Saddam. We were hungry when they were comfortable. They should leave now or they will have to pay.”
Long a by-word of the Muslims, the Palestinians are unwanted by the Shi’ite Islamic people, using them as pawns to provoke the eventual extermination of the State of Israel and provide a homeland for the Palestinian refugees. A people that Saddam Hussein provided housing and money, were now felt to bring suffering upon the Shi’ites by allying themselves with Sunni extremists and al Qaeda.
40,000 Palestinians were living predominately in the Haifa Street district in Baghdad. This was a Sunni insurgent-al Qaeda stronghold that was now being attacked by the U.S./Iraqi combined forces. Half of the Palestinians had been driven out and or eliminated while thousands were now refugees along the Iraqi-Jordanian border. The border crossings into the Hashemite Kingdom were closed. Not even the Palestinian leaders, Mahmoud Abbas or Hamas Ismail Haniyye, were willing to come to their aid. The “sword” of those seeking power and control quickly turned upon their own.
While in hiding, it was anticipated that al-Sadr would be seeking “clear guarantees from Tehran for a steady supply of military assistance should the engagement be protracted. He would assign the officers of the Revolutionary Guards al Quds battalion attached to the Medhi Army’s command in Baghdad as his emissaries with this errand. Such guarantees would be bad news for the US-Iraq campaign to stabilize Baghdad because it could lengthen the hostilities.
The next day after Bush’s television talk, American raiders made a predawn strike by helicopters in the Iraqi town of Irbil. There they disarmed the guards, broke into the Islamic Iranian command center, captured six attendees. During these hours there were also three large explosions that were reported in the southern town of Khorramshahr north of the oil port of Abadan on the Shatt al-Arb waterway near the Iraqi town of Basra. This was the key entry point for Iranian smuggling in fighters, weapons and explosives into Iraq.
According to DEBKA-Net-Weekly, and reported in the Canada Free Press on January 19, 2007 was a description of the American raid on Irbul:
Canada Free Press – “Eight days after the US raid on Irbil…DEBKA-Net-Weekly 286 exclusively revealed some of the evidence referred to by the two US officials of Iran's Revolutionary Guards's direct involvement in terrorist operations in Iraq.
Quote: Their biggest catch was Iranian colonel Fars Hassami, No. 3 in the Revolutionary Guards al Quds Brigade's hierarchy, two below the Brigades commander, General Qassem Sulemaini. Officers of the al Quds Brigade also serve with Hizballah combat units in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The interrogation of Hassami and his four fellow detainees yielded some eye-openers, supplemented by sweeps of their offices and computers.
1. Col. Hassam was found to have been in charge of Iranian operations in northern and central Iraq - from Kurdish Irbil down to the northern outskirts of Baghdad – and all links with Iraq's Shiite militias, including Moqtada Sadr's Medhi Army, and Sunni insurgent groups. Hassam was the live wire behind Iran's military, intelligence and logistic operations in the violence-stricken towns of the northern half of Iraq, Tal Afar, Mosul, Haditha, Kirkuk, Samarra, the Banji refinery town, Tikrit, Ramadi, Falluja and Baquba.
2. This same RG colonel managed an intensive recruitment campaign for the Sadrist Mehdi Army, which controls a large section of Baghdad and against which a combined Iraqi-US crackdown is under preparation. Hassam's recruiting center in Ur (birth town of Abraham) north of Baghdad appealed to volunteers aged 15 to 45. Each was handed $1,500 in cash.
3. A second US raid in Irbil uncovered a stockpile of Iranian weapons. It consisted of 40 tons of explosives, shoulder-borne anti-air missiles, anti-tank missiles, hundreds of automatic rifles and a pile of ordnance made in Iran.
4. Inventories of the weapons and ammo supplied the Medhi Army in Baghdad and Kirkuk by Iran in the last two months were detailed on computer hard disks. Maps showed the locations of anti-air missile positions for shooting down American helicopters.
5. Questioning of the captives yielded the identity of the RGs' overall commander for orchestrating Tehran's program to dominate Iraq. The name of Col. Bassem Abtakhi struck a familiar chord with the American interrogators. Informed Middle East intelligence circles have come up against him before as the RGs representative attached to the Hizballah command in Lebanon in 2004 and 2005. They were told he now operates out of the Fajr base in Ahwaz, capital of the southern Iranian province of Khozestan.
6. Another familiar face is that of the RG officer nicknamed Mahdi Muhandes (Mahdi the Engineer – a terrorist euphemism for bomb-maker). His real name is Col. Muhammad Ali Ibrahimi and the captured men named him as responsible for smuggling Iranian supplies of arms and military equipment into Iraq.”
With the raids by the American forces, the ante for retaliation became even higher against the Shi’ite political groups that dominated the Iraqi. The threat of the United States filing a UN Security Council complaint against the complicity of Iran in terrorism was added to the threat of American invasion or cross-border commando raids against the Revolutionary Guard’s al Quds base near the Iraqi-Iranian border.
The vast shake-up in the military administration of George Bush was swift after the Republican Party electoral defeat in November 2006. Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense since the beginning of the War on Terror, resigned. Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency under President George H.W. Bush was nominated as the Secretary of Defense. John Negroponte, former Director of the National Intelligence was reassigned to be the second in command as the Assistant Deputy at the State Department under Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
While Gates withdrew his nomination in 1987 to become the Director of the CIA because of his role in the Iran-Contra Affair, he was later confirmed in 1991. The reappointment of John Negroponte from the National Intelligence was viewed by Russian intelligence analysts as follows:
Sorcha Faal – “In what Russian Intelligence Analysts are describing as an indicator of a ‘stunning defeat’ for those within the American Military Power Structure supporting Israel’s planned aggression against Iran, the American War Leader, Bush, struck from power Israel’s last remaining ally in the US Intelligence field by removing Americas top spy, John Negroponte.
In an even more dramatic move, the American Leader is replacing Negroponte with retired US Navy Vice Admiral Michael McConnell to be Americas National Intelligence Director in charge of all that nations intelligence activities. Admiral McConnell joins his fellow US Military counterparts, US Air Force General Michael V. Hayden, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), former US Marine Hero and present Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Robert Mueller, and Director of the National Security Agency (NSA), Lieutenant General Keith B. Alexander, in completing the Military takeover of the entire American Domestic and Foreign Intelligence Services. These reports detail that the United States Military Establishment has long blamed the establishment of the Nation of Israel as a ‘strategic debacle’ to American interests in the Middle East.”
BibleSearchers Reflections clued in on this theme in November, 2006 when the article was posted titled, “Wake Up America, the “War of Civilizations is all about Israel.” The years of the most anti-Jewish attitude of the White House was during the years when Israel was forced into signing the Oslo Accord Agreement. This was during the American Presidential Administration of President George H.W. Bush in the year of 1991-1992 when James Baker III was the Secretary of State and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency was Robert Gates. So in 2008, America revisited the Oslo Accord era. James Baker III was resurrected from retirement and headed the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group and Robert Gates was resurrected from retirement to head the Department of Defense. The legacy of the Bush 2 presidency was about to be overshadowed by the legacy of the Bush 1 presidency.
As author, Jerome R. Corsi Ph.D. wrote:
Jerome Corsi Ph.D – “Maybe the best way to understand the Iraq Study Group (ISG) is that it was only Round One, George H. W. Bush's attempt to get his old team together to convince his son to abandon Iraq. The ISG included both James Baker III, Reagan's chief of staff who advised that Iran-Contra could well be illegal and might lead to impeachment, as well as Edwin Meese, who as Reagan's Attorney General led what amounted to a whitewash internal investigation of Iran-Contra Affair.
Baker typically represents the Council on Foreign Relations line on the Middle East – protect the oil, use military sparingly, and abandon Israel to Arab oil interests whenever possible. With this approach having been rejected by George W. Bush, the next alternative, Round Two, was for George H. W. Bush to bring in key hawks from the Iran-Contra days, to implement his son's expansion of the war.
Much of the plan for an Iraq surge in force seems to originate from Frederick Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute, whose report, ''A Plan for Success in Iraq,'' has been joined by retired Gen. Jack Keane. Kagan is a military historian who has taught at West Point. Gen. Keane was a career Army paratrooper (featured in Tom Clancy's book, ''Airborne''), who rose to being vice chief of staff of the Army.”
During the Spring of 2007, the Bush “Surge” in Iraq began to take effect. With the increased aggressiveness of the American military, the Shi’ite Iranian supported forces of Sheikh Moqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army moved underground and out of sight. As the quiescence of the insurgency and the opposition began to take note, silently the Bush-Cheney White House began to double track – Bush taking a hawkish stance in support of Israel and pushing Iran on the geopolitical stage to relinquish her rights to her nuclear program under the supervision of the world economic powers of the Western globalists of the Golden Internationale as the European Union and the United States.
Only five months after the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group findings, recommending the Bush White House to initiate a path of negotiations with Iran, on May 13, 2008, the Russian intelligence media organ called “What does it Mean” posted the following article titled, “United Front’ Against Israel Said Formed In Secret Cheney-Ahmadinejad Meeting”.
The Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was on a grand tour of the Gulf States Nations in early May 2008. While Ahmadinejad was visiting the UAE, Vice President Dick Cheney was next door in Saudi Arabia. In the properly appointed hour, they both just happened to arrive in the United Arab Emirates just as Iranian President Ahmadinejad was passing through to attend what was called a “historic meeting”.
Vice-President Dick Cheney arriving in Saudi – What Does It Mean
Iran Republic News Agency - "Iran has agreed to hold talks with the US on Iraq, Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad-Ali Hosseini said here Sunday.
As Cheney was meeting with Ahmadinejad, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was in Moscow briefing President Vladimir Putin of the new US-Iran Alliance for peace in Iraq that only put the Russian President into a rage. Forgotten by most, the war of the globalists continues to rage. Earlier that week on May 11, 2007, President Putin was confronted with the United States’ plan to place a missile shield at the European “door” to Moscow. It was to be placed in the European nation-members of the European Union, the former Russian satellite nations of Poland and the Czech Republic. In the Nation of Poland the plan would deploy 10 (ten) missile interceptors and in the Czech Nation a high tech radar unit that would scan the horizon for any threats against Europe from the countries of the East and the Middle East would be installed.
As Rice was meeting in Moscow to alleviate the Putin about the defensive-only shield in Poland and the Czech Republic, she was also to inform Putin that the United States was moving Russia outside the sphere of influence with Iran pushing aside the 800 year cultural ties between Russia and Shi’ite Persia-Iran since the days of the Ill-Khanate of the Greater Mongolian Empire in the 13th century. To the Russian rage also came the American dismissal by US Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, who claimed,
US Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns - “The Russians need to review their information. And understand that they are not part of NATO, so they are not in a position to modify this project. We have listened to them but they have been so intransigent in their position that most NATO allies now support our proposal.”
With the rage of an entrapped animal, Putin made the “unprecedented step” in a commemoration speech upon the end of World War II, by comparing the American leaders with Nazi Germany and Hitler stating:
President Vladimir Putin’s Enraged at Russia entrapped by NATO Alliance – What does it Mean
Russian President Vladimir Putin – “We do not have the right to forget the causes of any war, which must be sought in the mistakes and errors of peacetime. Moreover, in our time, these threats are not diminishing. They are only transforming, changing their appearance. In these new threats, as during the time of the Third Reich, are the same contempt for human life and the same claims of exceptionality and diktat (A harsh, unilaterally imposed settlement with a defeated party) in the world.”
And entrapped Russia had become. Afghanistan was elusive and Russia was driven out of her sphere of influence, and now was controlled by NATO. Most of the satellite states that surrounded Russia to the west, in the former United Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR), were now members or being wooed into the influence of NATO and the United States. Now the satellite states to the east of Russia in the Caspian Sea region like the State of Georgia were also being wooed into the sphere of influence of the western globalists. Russia’s implacable friend for 800 years, Persia-Iran, was one of the stalwarts of friends with Russia with an undying hatred to the United States. The ties were so strong that Russia spent billions in building a defensive shield against the west to the point of establishing Iran as a nuclear armed nation.
Outside the threat of removing Iran from the influence of Russia, came a second threat that the World Bank was proposing a $7 billion fund a build the proposed IPI pipeline from Iran to Pakistan and India. As reported:
Domain-b(usiness) – “The World Bank has expressed its readiness to fund the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline and described the $7 billion project as a `win-win deal' despite US reservations about the project. World Bank vice president Praful Patel said although the bank has not been approached by Pakistan to this effect formally or informally, the bank was ready to fund as and when approached."
So also in May 2007, the United States suddenly found itself on the verge of the return of the “Cold War” as noted by Scotland’s Daily Record News, when President Putin ordered, as he threatened, to send the Russian spy planes, the Tupelov Tu-142 bombers to begin to probe the western defense system by snooping on NATO exercises.
Scotland Daily Record – "A British fighter jet sees off a Russian spy plane in a dramatic showdown. An RAF Tornado pulls up alongside a Tupelov Tu-142 as it tries to snoop on a NATO exercise off the Outer Hebrides.
These spy plane encounters continued, when it was announced by the Telegraph UK News in September 2007 that twelve Russian TU-95 MC strategic bombers would be involved in an Arctic military exercise. They would lift off from five different Russian bases ranging from the city of Engels on the Volga River to the city of Anadyr on the Chukotka Peninsula within sight of the United States.
Yet, in spite of the Russian Bear image of invincibility, the TU-95 MC bombers were truly a relic of a bygone era, used in vintage movies and shows today. Put in production in 1954, its design was World War II 40’s vintage. They were Russia’s answer to compete with the American B-29 Superfortress that dropped the bomb over Hiroshima in 1945. For defensive weapons, the bomber carries only a few machine guns mounted on rotating turrets. With all the military posturing the most formidable was the threat to aim the aging nuclear missiles of Russia again at the United States.
It was at the end of April, 2008 it was reported by the Russian military analysts that Russian President Putin ordered a “full scale invasion” into the Georgian breakaway provinces of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, under the intense pretense that the United States was preparing to attack Iran. We must keep this in mind as we review later the Georgia-Russian war analysis later. Here we also witness the modern resurrection of the 800 year old international alliance partnership between the former Mongolian provinces of the Kipchak Khanate of Russia and the Ill-Khanate of Shi’ite Persia-Iran.
According to the BBC News on April 30, 2008, titled, “Georgia-Russian tensions Ramped Up”, the President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili was seeking to re-unite his country by hindering the break-away provinces of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, from switching their allegiance to Russia. Both Russia and Georgia’s military were reported to be building up their troop strength while Russia’s foreign minister claimed that a “bridgehead is being prepared for the start of a military operation against Abkhazia.’
All of this tension was surrounding the western globalist bid of NATO to admit Georgia as a member of the European Union, and virtually complete the vice of surrounding Russia by nations in alliance with the economic interests of the European Union and the United States and squeeze the life-blood from Russia.
Russia knew that she was becoming trapped by the military powers of the western economic globalists. Economic sanctions had been placed by Russia against the Nation of Georgia. At the same time, Russia was being accused by Georgia of shooting down one of their unmanned Georgian spy planes while Georgia was threatening to block the bid of Russia to enter the World Trade Organization.
By early May, 2008, over 130,000 Chinese troops were engaged in assisting 4.7 million Chinese families as refugees whose homes were destroyed by the 8.0 magnitude earthquake in the three worst hit provinces of Sichuan, Gansu, and Shaanxi.
It was suspected by China and many others in the world that this earthquake had been created by the secret weapon systems of the United States and the European Union.
At that same time, while China’s military were in full engagement in internal disasters and trying to prevent rioting by their own people, the military power of China was also hedged by the presence of 3 US aircraft carrier groups stationed off the coastline of China, in the Taiwan Sea.
As now President Putin, finishing out his last days as Prime Minister of Russia, was convinced that only Russia, and Russia alone stood in the path of the disintegration of the Islamic nations in the Middle East. He was of a firm opinion that the plans of the Golden Internationale, the western globalists, was to split the Islamic nations into warring feudal states centered around their warring religious ideologies.
The belief that the Nation of Iraq would one day be split into three smaller mini-states based around the Kurdish, Sunni, and Shi’ite social-religious differences has for several years been a valid assumption. In January 2007, BibleSearchers posted the article, “The Map of the “Middle East” that explored the concept that truly the western globalists were seeking to remap a “New Middle East” by a concept called “Creative Destruction”. They felt that it was not only possible to manage the chaos of war and its destruction but they would also be able to “thrive on” the profits of creating a New World Order and building the nations that would be supportive of this new age.
Russian President Putin’s rage was only bolstered by his observation at NATO along with the Clinton White House in the War in Bosnia and Herzegovina between the years of March 1992 and November 1995, that later brought the charges of genocide by many Bosnians and Croatians against Serbia and their treatment of Bosnian Muslims. Today, according to Putin, NATO and the United States were seeking unilateral recognition, as an independent state, of the Serbian breakaway province of the ethnic Albanian-dominated state of Kosovo that had been under UN supervision since 1999.
While Russia was going defensive by dispatching Acting Secretary Valentin Sobolev of Russia’s National Security Council with Saeed Jalili, representing the Supreme National Security Council of Iran, they met to discuss private security and defensive matters while coordinating Russia’s military response to a potential American military attack against Iran.
In the meantime, the United States Navy was ordered by Defense Secretary Robert Gates to send another US Navy aircraft carrier group to the Persian Gulf to keep the pressure upon Iran and reminding the mullah regime about the strength of the American military power.
US Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, on behalf of the Nation of Iraq accused Syria, at the UN Security Council, of allowing terrorists and weapons to continue flowing through Syria while al-Qaeda operators continued to work within Syria.. At the same time, Khalilzad accused the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary guard Corps, called the Quds Force, were training, arming, and funding illegal Islamic Shi’ite Muslim groups to continue the internal insurgent revolution against the legally elected government of Iraq.
During these same days, April 27 through May 5, 2008, while the Cyclone Nargis was plowing into the ancient land of Burma, and later when the massive 8.0 magnitude Chinese earthquake destroyed the lives of over 90,000 Chinese on May 12, 2008 plus one of the largest secret Chinese nuclear armories, several nuclear warheads, a new weapons test base, plus a military and several civilian nuclear power plants, the Bush White House ordered the entire executive government to “prepare contingency plans” for a surprise, "decapitating" attack on the federal government”. Of interest, the responsibility for the coordination for the plans was taken away from the Department of Homeland Security and given to the direct control of the White House.
Now the job of the coordinating policy would be assigned to the President’s Assistant for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, who, in the last days of the Bush White House would be Frances Fragos Townsend. He would assume the title of National Continuity Coordinator who in turn would consult with Bush’s National Security Adviser, Stephen J. Hadley.
The real concern, as reported, was the prospect that a nuclear bomb would be set off in the capital city of Washington D.C. without any advance warning, a concern that has been sited by many security analysts since 911. These nuclear bombs could have been placed in advance by terrorists or a foreign country. The 72 paragraph order, called the National Security Presidential Directive 51 and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20, went on to state that the purpose was to spread the leadership, staff and infrastructure of the United States Executive Branch to several geographic locations in order to increase the survivability of the American government and keep the US government functioning in case a nuclear attack does occur.
If such a directive was now being issued, why was it not important to send this directive earlier in the administration of the 43rd President of the United States? What has been known, after the 2001 attack on Washington D.C. and New York City, the Bush White House has rotated the assignment of about 100 senior civilian mangers to rotate to several secret locations outside of Washington D.C. for up to weeks or months at a time. This has been known as the American “Shadow Government” under the leadership of Vice President Richard Cheney.
According to one investigator, there is only one country in the world that the American White House fears more, the Israelis, for there are many reports that the Israeli Mossad Intelligence service have secreted “alleged” nuclear weapons to several different sites around the United States. So, President Bush is now preparing the American government to survive by the formal issue of “new commands” for the American Shadow government to survive, all under his direct control and no one else.
One day after the Chinese earthquake, in what was promoted as the “PR event of the Century”, U.S. President George W. Bush, former British prime minister Tony Blair and media mogul Rupert Murdoch arrived in the land of Israel on May 13, 2008. They attended the President Shimon Peres’ Presidential Conference in Jerusalem along with 13 heads of state, 14 former heads of state and a number of other distinguished guests. The moment of honor was the 60th Anniversary of the Labor Zionist State of Israel.
Two days later, May 15, 2008, President Bush addressed the Israeli Knesset to the raving praise of the Israeli MKs who gave him six standing ovations. The reaction of the Israeli leaders who listened to the speech ranged from “the best speech I’ve ever heard him give” to “He is the only international leader we know who truly understands the threat of terrorism and its inherent evil and he isn't afraid to say so. Baruch Hashem!" According to Lekerev Report, we quote:
- “Bush brought the house down when he said to the Israeli people at large,
"Israel has seven million people but when you are
fighting terrorism, you are 307 million strong because America
stands with you." Even in the coffee houses of Tel Aviv
the people began to clap and shout…
The Lekarev Report
He garnered another standing
ovation with the statements: "Some seem to believe we should
negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some
ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all
along," Bush said in his historic address before the Knesset
on Thursday. He did not mention Obama by name or even seem
to allude to any partisan divide on the hotly-debated isolation
''We have heard this foolish delusion before," he continued, "as Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is - the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.''
Speaking of the "promise of God" for a "homeland for the chosen people" in Israel, Bush told the Knesset after a visit to the Roman-era Jewish fortress at Masada: "Masada shall never fall again, and America will always stand with you." Bush described the "bonds of the Book" - faith in the Bible shared by Christians like himself and Jews - as bolstering an "unbreakable" alliance between Israel and the United States. During a later visit to the Israel Museum, Bush, referring to the old biblical texts housed at the building, said "these documents tell the story of a righteous God and his relationship with an ancient people." "There is no doubt in my mind that the patriarchs of ancient Israel and the pioneers of modern Israel would marvel at the achievements of this nation," he said.
On the same day of his Knesset speech, President
Bush was taken on a side trip to the Herodian Fortress of Masada
where he had earlier spoke in visionary terms of the future of
Israel evoking the apocalyptic images of the current regional
conflicts that were “an ancient battle between good and evil.” As
reported in the Christian Science Monitor on May 16, 2008,
the article titled, “In Israel, Bush
outlines a Blunt Vision for the Middle East” noted the
Christian Science Monitor - “President Bush…stood before the Knesset and laid out a vision for the Middle East 60 years down the road: an Israel that still stands tall, lives next to a Palestinian state, and is surrounded by countries where democracy and human rights reign. But his shorter-term vision, particularly in terms of his view of how things look today, sounded like a return to the stark rhetoric he became famous for in 2002 when he described Iran, Iraq, and North Korea as an axis of evil.
His prepared speech was also laden with religious imagery, mapping a spiritual and ideological picture of a close US-Israel relationship that seemed unprecedented in a speech by any US president, analysts say. "This struggle is waged with the technology of the 21st century, but at its core it is the ancient battle between good and evil," Mr. Bush said Thursday in his official speech at the Knesset, Israel's parliament. "The killers claim the mantle of Islam, but they are not religious men," he said. "No one who prays to the God of Abraham could strap a suicide vest to an innocent child, or blow up guiltless guests at a Passover Seder, or fly planes into office buildings filled with unsuspecting workers."
In the speech, Bush offered unwavering support for Israel, referring to its enemies in Hamas and Hezbollah and Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as dark forces that Israel and the West should not be fooled into "appeasing," evoking the world's appeasement of Hitler in the 1930s. "No nation should ever be forced to negotiate with killers pledged to its destruction," Bush said, a reference to suggestions from some mediators – such as former President Jimmy Carter in a recent mission here – that Israel should negotiate with Hamas, which controls Gaza. The comment was also seen as aimed at Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama who has suggested that the US sit down at the table with Iran and Syria. "There are good and decent people who cannot fathom the darkness in these men and try to explain their words away. This is natural. But it is deadly wrong," Bush said.
"As witnesses to evil in the past, we carry a solemn responsibility to take these words seriously," he added, after mentioning Mr. Ahmadinejad's suggestions that Israel ought to be "wiped off the map….Permitting the world's leading sponsor of terror to possess the world's deadliest weapon would be an unforgivable betrayal of future generations. For the sake of peace, the world must not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon," Bush said, engendering a long round of applause.
Analysts here were quick to note some of the words that he did not mention. These include the "Annapolis Process”, which he launched last November, and Israeli settlement building in the West Bank, which Palestinians view as one of the primary obstacles to peace.
As President Bush was overlooking the Dead Sea from the ruins of Masada, back in Brussels, Belgium, the NATO national chiefs of staff were meeting with Russia’s Chief of Staff General Yuri Baluyevski and listened “with a lot of understanding” as he spoke.
Russia’s Chief of Staff General Yuri Baluyevski – “NATO member states should stop providing arms to Georgia, as their actions are creating dangerous instability in the South. The only decision today which may stop ... a (possible) military conflict in Georgia is to stop the militarization of Georgia. Unfortunately, in the past several months and years this has been growing, and I gave some examples today. NATO has to take measures in order to prevent arms supplies to that region.”
It was at that meeting that General Baluyevski named Turkey, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria and the United States as the countries that were supplying Georgia with arms. It was there that he also defended the recent insertion of more Russian military troops into the breakaway region of Abkhazia stating that “thanks to Russia's peacekeepers, there is no violence between Abkhazia and Georgia.” Yet, earlier at the NATO April summit in Bucharest, it was NATO that was vigorously discussing that one day an alliance between Georgia and NATO would occur. These discussions caused the sudden rise of acrimonious accusations between Georgia accusing Russia of shooting down one of her spy planes and Russia accusing Georgia of preparing to start a war in the region.
As he returned later to Russia, General Yuri Baluyevski reported to the Kremlin a “strongly worded report” to Russian President Medvedev of his meeting with NATO and stated that the United States was “fully preparing” for Armageddon. Two weeks later, on May 31, 2008, Prime Minister Putin was interviewed by the French Le Monde, when he urged France to distance itself from the United States, whom he described as a “frightening monster.”
Four days later, General Yuri Baluyevski was dismissed as the Russian military’s top general and replaced with the Military minister over spending and administrative priorities, General Nikolai Makarov. Putin went on to express concern how the Western globalist’s “military infrastructure was coming closer to our borders.” He later denounced the United States of seeking a global “monopoly in world affairs.”
Little did Israel know that within sixty days, the destiny of Israel would forever be altered. The nation that had given so much to the defense and success of the Labor Zionist Nation of Israel was behind the scenes preparing for her demise.
It was on June 4, 2008 that the International Bilderberg conference was held at the Westfields Marriot at Chantilly in Northern Virginia. There next to the capital of the United States, one of the elite globalist organizations, true to its history, met in guarded secrecy as the European counterpart to the American Council of Foreign Relations. Described as the “one of the most influential organizations in the world” by the British Broadcasting Corporation, the Dutch based organization whose office is in Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands met in a highly secretive conference that was closed to all press in order to openly discuss major issues affecting the Western elite political, government, and business representatives. It has been their goal for the western economic order to win the ultimate prize; complete global economic control of every nation on the earth. Every fourth year they met on the North American continent in either the United States or Canada. For years, BibleSearchers has called this group and those representing the Western economic internationalist and trans-nationalists global agenda, the Golden Internationale, the word coined by the late Pope John Paul II and his mentor, Cardinal Wyszynski of Warsaw, Poland.
According to and reported by France’s Directorate-General for External Security, the tension between the American proponents and those against a war with Iran exploded at this 56th annual Bilderberg conference that was held out side the capital of the United States.
Europe and especially France were quite sensitive to the increasing escalation of rhetoric by Russia and the evidence of mismanagement within the US Armed Forces of the prior decisions by this secret and powerful world order body. With the accusations of now Russia Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, and now the impelling criticisms by the Bilderbergs in their secret confab in town, the White House quickly ordered the Defense Secretary Robert Gates to clean house in the United States Air Force.
The next day, June 5, 2008, in apparent quick response to the Bilderberg row, the Defense Secretary Robert Gates issued one of the most massive shake-ups in the top brass of the United States Air Force in decades, as reported by the AP News:
AP News - Defense Secretary Robert Gates ousted the Air Force's top military and civilian leaders Thursday, holding them to account in a historic Pentagon shake-up after embarrassing nuclear mix-ups. Gates announced at a news conference that he had accepted the resignations of Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Michael Moseley and Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne - a highly unusual double firing. Gates said his decision was based mainly on the damning conclusions of an internal report on the mistaken shipment to Taiwan of four Air Force electrical fuses for ballistic missile warheads. And he linked the underlying causes of that slip-up to another startling incident: the flight last August of a B-52 bomber that was mistakenly armed with six nuclear-tipped cruise missiles.”
The following day, June 6, 2008, it was reported that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the two champion contenders for the Democratic Presidential Nomination were summoned to Northern Virginia, on the outskirts of Washington, D.C. There in the secret chambers in the presence of the Bilderberg globalists like David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger it was also reported, according to Russian analysts, that these two candidates were told by the Bilderbergs that “their plans for total global war will not be stopped.” It could be assumed that this war must inevitably be between Russia and China against the European Union and the United States.
While the European Bilderbergs were convening near Washington, back in Europe, the new Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was on his inaugural trip to Western Europe. He met with the German Chancellor Angela Merkel. There in private consultation with Germany’s new Chancellor, who was reputed to be the daughter of the German Fuehrer Adolf Hitler, the new Russian President confided with the German Chancellor that he was “worried” that the military expansion led by America and NATO would destroy the relationship between the East and the West “in a radical way, for a long time”.
As reported in Telegraph.Co UK, Medvedev called for a “regional pact” that would replace the aging “Cold War peace treaties” and effectively circumvent the military power of the United States. As stated by PM Medvedev, “In the current conditions, with no one wanting war in Europe and with all of us having the experience of the 20th century (Nazi Germany invasion in World War II) such an accord would have all the chances of success," while at the same time, he “vociferously objected to US plans to build a missile interceptor system in Poland and the Czech Republic” even though America was insisting was “designed against lone missile strikes from rogue states such as North Korea or Iran.
He did resonate with a common synergy with the German Chancellor when he proposed a united “international consortia” between Russia and Europe that would manage energy supply lines to the largest European exporter of goods, yet totally dependant upon reliable supplies of oil and gas. This wedge would come to haunt America, Germany and Europe within weeks as a new embargo was placed against Iran by Europe and the United States. Russian would soon invade the Nation of Georgia and attack the NATO controlled Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Oil Pipeline that carried a million barrels of oil a day away from Russia that came from the Nations of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan along the Caspian Sea through Georgia, and Turkey to the Turkish Mediterranean Seaport Terminal of Cehhan.
The international relations had only a three week respite when again Russian military analysts were reporting on June 24, 2008 that Prime Minister Putin was ordering an “immediate” retaliate nuclear strike against the forces of the United States when Putin and Medvedev heard the reports that American and Israeli warplanes were nearing the Iranian border to attack the Iran Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant that was built and fueled by Russia. Two days before the Bilderberg secret conference near Washington DC, as French President Nicolas Sarkozy was leaving from a state visit to the Labor Zionist State of Israel, he was targeted by what appeared to be an assassination attempt on his life, that if successful was thought by some world analysts would have been blamed on the Iran sponsored Lebanese militia, Hezbollah, and thus justifying an attack upon Iran.
True to the BibleSearchers biblical thesis that Russia was truly one of the “Great Horns” of Iran, it was Russian Prime Minister Putin who strode onto the world political scene in defense of Iran. Bush’s America had been under an illusion that Russia could geo-politically be wooed into the economic world of siding with Europe, her economic partners and separated from her geo-political global brotherhood with China and Iran. The bonds that tied the ancient brotherhood of the Mongolian Empire would be too hard to break. This is like personal human inter-relationships where blood relationships are stronger bonds than business or friendship relationships. The wooing of Russia at the recent NATO meeting in Prague and the private retreat at the summer home of Putin at Sochi on the Black Sea, led to an illusion that the former Russian KGB leader’s eyes would “blink” and that his geo-political image of the international world would swayed him away from his Mongolian Brotherhood had became an American illusion. Well known in intelligence circles, “Putin does not blink” physically and philosophically.
All the “signs” coming from Washington and Israel suggested that “twelfth hour” had arrived for an attack upon Iran. It was reported by “The Australian” on June 25, 2006 that a clustering of global events was giving strong signals that the United States, Europe, and Israel were preparing for an actual strike against the Nation of Iran and her nuclear power program. For seven months now, the leaders of American and European leaders had been parading to Jerusalem and officially speaking in Israel, at their Parliament called the “Knesset”, and visiting Yad Vashem the Israeli Holocaust Museum. The facts that they were geo-politically posturing could not be ignored.
American President George W. Bush started the year with his first visit to Jerusalem on January 10, 2008, under formidable security, to shore up the negotiations between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. It was his dream and his legacy the he would promise to bring the Palestinian people their first nation that would co-exist side by side with Israel. As he spoke:
1. President George W. Bush - “I share with these two leaders the vision of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security. Both of these leaders believe that the outcome is in the interest of their peoples and are determined to arrive at a negotiated solution to achieve it. The point of departure for permanent status negotiations to realize this vision seems clear; there should be an end to the occupation that began in 1967. The agreement must establish Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people, just as Israel is a homeland for the Jewish people. These negotiations must ensure that Israel has secure, recognized, and defensible borders. And they must ensure that the state of Palestine is viable, contiguous, sovereign, and independent.
2. The German Chancellor Angela Merkel arrived in Jerusalem, on March 18, 2008, and spoke to the Israeli Knesset to a standing ovation in the German language. Some Israeli MKs walked out in protest. She spoke these words; “Especially in this place, I emphasize: Every German government and every chancellor before me was committed to the special responsibility Germany has for Israel's security. This historic responsibility is part of my country's fundamental policy. It means that for me, as a German chancellor, Israel's security is non-negotiable.”
3. The American President George W. Bush arrived on May 15, 2008, speaking at the Israeli Independence Day celebrations in Jerusalem speaking words of placation, affirmation and solidarity to Israel with seven standing ovations, when he promised to the Israeli Knesset to a rousing applause saying; “Israel has seven million people but when you are fighting terrorism, you are 307 million strong because America stands with you." Bush then moved on to a five day, three country Middle East tour, first meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, now the official representative of the Vatican and the Quartet of the Middle East peace-makers, the United Nations, Russia, the European Union and the United States, then on to Saudi Arabia, and on to Egypt.
4. The Jewish French President Nicolas Sarkozy arrived on June 22, 2008 as the second French President to speak at the Israeli Knesset after French President Francois Mitterrand in 1982 when he spoke these words; "France is Israel's friend and will always stand by it when its security or existence are threatened. And those who scandalously call for Israel's destruction will always – always – be faced and blocked by France."
5. The British Prime Minister Gordon Brown arrived on July 21, 2008 as the first speech by a British prime minister to the Israeli parliament who also promised that Britain ‘will always stand at Israel’s side”. He went on to say, "Britain is your true friend. A friend in difficult times as well as in good times, a friend who will stand beside you whenever your peace, your stability and your existence are under threat; a friend who shares an unbreakable partnership based on shared values of liberty, democracy and justice… Britain and Israel continue to stand together.
6. So to those who question Israel's right to exist and threaten the lives of its citizens through terror we say: the people of Israel have a right to live here, to live freely and to live in security… And to those who believe that threatening statements fall upon indifferent ears we say in one voice that it is totally abhorrent for the President of Iran to call for Israel to be wiped from the map of the world…I reaffirm the special relationship between Israel and the United States, [and] my abiding commitment to its security".
7. The American Republican presidential candidate, John McCain arrived in Israel on March 19, 2008, sent as a part of the Senate Armed Service Committee tour. There he pledged support for Israel’s existence when he said, "If Hamas and Hizballah succeed here, they are going to succeed everywhere. They are dedicated to the extinction of everything that the U.S., Israel and the West believe and stand for." While at Yad Vashem the Israeli Holocaust Museum, he wrote in the guestbook, "I am deeply moved. Never again."
8. The American Democratic presidential candidate, Barak Obama arrived in Israel on July 23, 2008, a trip that overshadowed the earlier trip by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, visiting the Yad Vashem the Israeli Holocaust Museum, the Western Wall and numerous Israeli politicians, when he made oblique and veiled comments to Israel’s sovereign right to defend herself with a comment on the suspected Syrian nuclear site stating, “I think that there was sufficient evidence that they were developing a site using a nuclear or using … a blueprint that was similar to the North Korean model” and then supporting Israel’s right to confront terrorism with these words, “I strongly condemn this (bulldozer) attack and will always support Israel in confronting terrorism and pursuing lasting peace and security" and to Israeli President Shimon Peres, "I reaffirm the special relationship between Israel and the United States, [and] my abiding commitment to its security".
Even more significant were the “signs” to Russia that the time had come for America to either confront or to give in to the Red Internationale’s bid for world domination or to became at least an equal partner in world dominion. These “signs” by late June, 2008 included:
John Bolten, former American Ambassador to the United Nations – The Lekarev Report
· The former US ambassador to the United Nations and a proclaimed hawk for Israel, John Bolton was the first US political leader to come forth with an actual time frame for an attack. He suggested that such a strike would occur between November, the date a new president was elected and January, the last day President George W. Bush left office. Bolten also proclaimed that the Bush administration had lost enthusiasm and given up thinking that it was a real possibility that America would attack Iran, saying, “I just don’t think it’s in the cards.” Yet Bolton was optimistic that Israel would act unilaterally in any military strike, yet we wonder would America approve?
· The hosts of European and American politicians appeared to officially swarm to Israel to pay deep respect for their immovable ties between the Western Golden Internationale globalists and Israel starting with the American President George W. Bush on January 10, 2008.
· Israel was also displaying a more aggressive attitude as the Pentagon sanctioned a large scale military operation over the eastern Mediterranean Sea in mid-June when more than 100 Israeli and Grecian jets trained for a long-range assault mission. A fact not missed was that the same flight pattern east instead of west of Israel went right over Iran’s nuclear power plants. According to Israeli intelligence chiefs opinions, "Nobody can explain why Iran is enriching uranium," said a senior Israeli official…The second thing is they are developing a delivery system and nobody can deny that. Israel can't take the risk that Iran will be nuclear."
· Then came the pronouncements from hosts of politicians and defense officials. They were openly stating in late June that there was a chance of a strike against Iran. During this time, US Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Admiral Michael Mullen met with Israeli Defense Chief, Gabi Ashkenazi. For those with “eyes” that were watching, the last time these two met, Israel bombed a Syrian nuclear reactor that was under construction near the Iraqi border.
Even the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei began to issue warnings to America and Israel, as reported in the Islamic Republic News Agency:
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei - “The White House rulers are now the most hated rulers and policy makers on earth. The world domineering powers' rulers, i.e. the White House officials, have now turned into the most resented rulers and policy makers worldwide and the ‘death to the USA' slogan, which was once coined and chanted by the Iranian nation, has now spread to other nations too."
This prompted the memories of the warning by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Mohamad ElBaradei when he told al-Arabiya television that if an attack upon Iran would occur, the entire Middle East would explode into a “fireball”.
Suddenly on June 27, 2008, a giant step was made in the reconciliation between the North Korean regime of Kim Yong II, when North Korea presented his nuclear dossier on the history of its nuclear weapons program. According to the report, since North Korea first established its program by building the large nuclear reactor and research plant at Yongbyon with the assistance of the Soviets in the 1960s, today they have enough nuclear material to make over 200 1-5 kiloton nuclear bombs. Yet, it was with the assistance of Pakistan’s “Father of the Atomic Bomb”, Abdul Qadeer (AQ) Khan to actually build a nuclear bomb that they exploded on October 9, 2006. The Western world was suddenly aroused.
According to the Russian military analysts analysis, documented within the 18,000 pages of the highly classified nuclear dossier on the North Korean nuclear weapons program, “the US Intelligence Community ‘shuddered’ at the full implication of Iran’s involvement in the building of North Korean’s nuclear weapons.” Only a partial revelation had hit the American intelligence community as far back as November 17, 2006.
DEBKAfiles reported that in George Bush’s strategy review conference with the Iraq Study Group was the insight that twelve days before the North Korean’s first nuclear test on October 10, 2006, a secret Iranian military delegation of nuclear and missile experts were visiting Pyongyang. They were also taken to the North Korean site of the Yongbyon Reactor and also to the Punggye-ri Testing Site in the far north while they were preparing for the upcoming North Korean test.
It was known at that time that the Chinese were already aware of the more intimate relationships between the Iranians and the North Koreans. They also knew that the Iranians no doubt had been briefed on North Korea’s secret preparations for nuclear testing and were “willing to instruct Iranian scientists and technicians in Pyongyang. They also gave them access to their secret testing site and taught them how to set up and execute a nuclear weapons test. The dots did not connect that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards were the financiers and already intimately involved in the nuclear testing program, as though it were the Iranian nuclear testing program being conducted by a surrogate country.
The fact that Iran was already a nuclear nation was testified in the Iran Press Service by the Russian Deputy Chief of Staff, General Yuri Baluyevsky during the Putin-Bush Summit at Sochi on June 4, 2008, who stated:
Russian Deputy Chief of Staff, General Yuri Baluyevsky - “Iran does have nuclear weapons. Of course, these are non-strategic nuclear weapons. I mean these are not ICBMs with a range of more than 5,000 kilometers and more. But as a military man, I see no danger of aggression against Russia by Iran. As for the danger of Iran’s attack on the United States, the danger is zero.”
This fact in itself must sink in to our cerebral consciousness before the reality of its revelation begins to unfold. It was the opinion of the western intelligence services that has been presented to the American population is that Iran is developing a nuclear weapons program and is only in the developmental stage of the centrifuge preparation of a fuel core of fissible nuclear material. With the revelation of the North Korean program and the involvement of Iran in the development of their nuclear bomb meant, if these facts that true to their confession, Iran does already have nuclear bombs.
Not testified was the fact that the ruling Ayatollahs and clerics have declared the intent to destroy Israel and eliminate them from the entire Middle Eastern region. The evidence is that the financing of North Korea’s nuclear research program that eventually led to the development of the nuclear bomb was funded by the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution, known in the western world as the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.
Therefore, when Russian President Vladimir Putin denied at the Sochi Summit the United State’s charges that Russia was assisting Iran in building a nuclear power reactor at Bushehr, he denied that Russia was helping Iran secure weapons of mass destruction. This denial could very well be true, for Iran already had such weapons.
When the American State Department and the Israeli government in Tel-Aviv accused the Putin government of supplying Iran with the secret knowledge on how to develop missile and nuclear technology, and Putin denied, the Russians may also have been correct. Iran may already have the technology, missiles and the nuclear bombs to hit Tel-Aviv and Europe.
The implications were even more serious, if the American intelligence analysts reports on the North Korean nuclear dossier are correct then a new revelation has now erupted on the international geo-political scene. The Iranian may now have weapons of mass destruction in the armories of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. How did they acquire these nuclear bombs? According to Russian intelligence analysts, it has now been revealed:
Sorcha Faal – “According to the United States Government Accountability Office, over $6 billion given to Pakistan by the US since their ‘War on Terror’ was begun in 2001 has been ‘lost’. Pakistan has also refused the demands of the US Congress to be given access to AQ Khan, and as we can read as reported by the Sify News Service:
The Iranian Russian built Nuclear Power Plant at Bushehr – What Does It Mean
Sify News Service - “Pakistan has rejected the demand of US lawmakers for direct access to nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, saying it alone can probe into allegations that he proliferated the country's nuclear secrets. "We have made it clear, at every level, that no outside authority can interview Dr Khan," a senior official of the foreign office told IANS.
The American’s ‘greatest fears’ have now been realized, said one Top Russian General in these reports, due to Iran now being able to combine with the nuclear bombs they now have with the cruise missiles they had previously acquired from Ukraine, and of which we can read as previously reported by the BBC News Service:
BBC News - “Ukrainian arms dealers smuggled 18 nuclear-capable cruise missiles to Iran and China in 1999-2001, Ukraine's prosecutor-general has said. The Soviet-era Kh-55 missiles - also known as X-55s - have a maximum range of 2,500 km (1,550 miles). They are launched by long-range bombers…It added that the missiles were not exported with nuclear warheads.”
With the understanding of the revelation that first, Iran has had nuclear weapons for several years and that second, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards were the financers of North Korea’s nuclear program, and that third, Iran now has the possession of cruise missiles that could be armed by nuclear weapons, two important seismic events occurred in the last few days of June 2008;
First, the President of the United States, George W. Bush signed an Executive Order with the declaration that America was now in a “State of Emergency” both economically and militarily. This was reported by the White House News:
White House News – "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that the current existence and risk of the proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material on the Korean Peninsula constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat."
As of June 28, 2008, the President of the United States now has the constitutional right, plus all the extraordinary powers granted to him, that the president could bypass the United States Congress in order to launch a nuclear missile attack upon Iran, Russia and any other nation that comes against the defense and security of the United States. This right could include the authorization given under the new National Emergencies Act that the President could also institute marital law, suspend all civil liberties over the citizens of America, including suspending the impending elections of the next president of the United States if he were to declare that it was to the best interest of the United States.
According to Kremlin fears, “President Bush this week changed the entire intelligence structure of his Nation with the creation of the greatest spying apparatus in history, and modeled upon those enacted by the German Nazis, and which as many have known, had recreated the American intelligence organizations after World War II.
What was most interesting in relation to this new and expanded Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), was that the Russian intelligence noted that the DNI’s first task was to “begin dismantling the internal factions of those US intelligence networks believed to have been the masterminds of the 9/11 terror attacks”. Those targeted included:
“Former Top US Air Force Brigadier General Thomas L. Tinsley, who was in the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) on September 11, 2001 and failed to alert American Military Forces to the ongoing attacks was found dead with a gunshot to his chest and stated…to have been a suicide.”…
“Top US biodefense researcher Bruce E. Ivins has also been reported to have committed suicide with a massive drug overdose and was said to be behind the 9/11 anthrax attacks that terrorized US media members and lawmakers.”…
“US Naval Air Forces are reported by Russian FSB sources to have put under arrest the commander of the US Navy’s nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington, Captain David C. Dykhoff, and who on 9/11 was the commander of the US Naval Air Systems Command Headquarters located at Patuxent River Naval Air Station outside of Washington D.C. and failed to protect the US Capital from being attacked. (Note: US propaganda media sources are not reporting Captain Dykhoff’s arrest and are only stating that he has been ‘fired’.)”
It was in mid-summer as the sweltering heat brought devastating floods to the Mississippi River in the Heartland of America and nine hundred forest fires that destroyed the forests of the Pacific-Northwest, a new “heart” was being created in the “Prince of the Land of Magog”. This would be a part of the apocalyptic prophetic cascade that the God of Israel would guide all the prophecies of the Israel and Jewish prophets of old into a mighty prophetic stream. This would sweep this world towards the final battle of the nations that would rise up against Jerusalem and the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Did not the Prophet of Ezekiel predict?
Ezekiel 38:10-12 – “Thus says the Lord God; ‘One day it shall come to pass that thoughts will arise in your mind, and you will make an evil plan’ You will say, ‘I will go up against a land of unwalled villages; I will go to a peaceful people, who dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates’ to take plunder and to take booty, to stretch out your hand against the waste places that are again inhabited, and against a people gathered from the nations, who have acquired livestock and goods, who dwell in the midst of the land.”
Did not the kabbalist rabbis of Israel interpret the passages of Ezekiel 38 that the Americas and the American Indians is the home and the land of the descendants of the ancient Mongolian tribes that migrated east towards the land of ancient China? There traveling north of the Great Wall of China, called the Wall of Al-Magog, they migrated across the Aleutian Straits into Alaska and from there populated the Americas as the American Indians. According to the prophecy of Gog in the Land of Magog,
BibleSearchers – “Here we see the United States as the leading global and economic power of the Golden Internationale. The identity of the “Chief Leader” of this global economic and political force is coming into clearer focus. But how did America assume the role of the Land of Magog?
We have looked at various possibilities for who Gog could be. We know today that the tribes of Meshach and Tuval have stayed in their lands of inheritance in northern Eurasia near the Ural Mountains. If fact, they are as far north of Jerusalem as one can inhabit the land without crossing or moving beyond the North Pole. Meshach and Tuval truly dwell in the uttermost and furthest part of the North and still be on the Eurasian continent. No matter how you look at the prophecy, somewhere, Meshach and Tuval will be a part of this time of the end coalition.
But nowhere in the Ezekiel prophecy are any hints that Gog is anything else but from the Land of Magog. Does that mean his ancestry is from the tribe of Magog? No! Yet somehow, he is identified to the Land of Magog or their tribal inheritance after they left Babylon and the Tower of Babel. What ties could this leader have with the Mongolians? Did some form of Mongolian blood slip into his veins?
U.S President George W. Bush, left, stops to shake hands with Mongolians in traditional costumes he visits the Ikh Tenger on Mongolian culture, in Ulan Bator, Mongolia on Monday. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
We do know from history that the Golden Horde did control the eastern provinces of pre-Renaissance Russia. They also made it to the doors of Jerusalem in the 13th century but were repulsed by the Mameluks and never did return. Could Gog be a leader from the land of Russia as popularly is acclaimed by many Christian prophetic expositors? This fact is possible. The problem we encounter is that to date no leader from the Eastern Asian Siberian provinces that were conquered by the Mongolian hordes has ever been voted President or in the past ruled as the Tsar of Russia. Since we always look for a “shadow picture” to fill in the tapestry of Biblical prophecy, a Russian leader from the Land of Mogog is possible but remote.
Could there be a possibility that Gog could come from land stolen from the tribes of Magog? We now have seen that the “American Dream” was predicated on the fact that the land of the American Indians, the descendants of the ancient Mongols, was in fact stolen from them. The facts of deceit, treachery, massacres and genocide against the American Indians have been well documented in American history as they were moved to Indian Reservations on land useless to the white settlers. This history does suggest that the United States of America has earned the honor and the curses of inheriting Mogog’s dream and prophetic destiny.
Today the United States stands on the threshold of her national destiny. The 43rd President of the United States, George W. Bush, has the destined honor of possibly being the prophesied Gog from the Land of Magog. His first major international foray into geo-politics was to head straight to ancient Babylon and depose the Iraqi President who felt he was destined to revive the glory of ancient Nebuchadnezzar.
Does President George W. Bush have ancestral roots to identify himself with the Land of Magog. Does he have any American Indian blood? Did his family have any dealings with any of the vanishing leaders of that ancient people, the Native Americans as the ancestors of the tribe of Magog?
As the destined leader of the “New World” empire, will the last world major superpower rise to the honor of defending the national interest of their country (and their prosperity) to appease the children of Amalek ben Ishmael, those that have a genetic and pathological hatred to Israel and Esau ben Isaac, known to the Jews as the Edomites of Rome and the evil forces of anti-Semitism that swirl around the European Union today.”
On July 19, 2008, the United States Under-Secretary of State William Burns went to the European-Iranian negotiating talks in Geneva. At that moment of time, by Burn’s presence at direct negotiating talks with Iran, the White House officially announced its secret diplomatic track between Washington and Tehran. These prior undisclosed talks over the past few weeks for what was called “far reaching” included the political stability of Lebanon in the new national government where the surrogate of Iran, Hezbollah was able to win veto power in the government and ministerial seats. Even more important, thanks to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, it brought Syria’s President Bashar Assad restored back into the central political arena of Middle East power.
Three weeks earlier, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced that the American administration was planning on “opening a US interests section in Tehran similar to one maintained in Cuba.” With American diplomats, Rice has broken away from the international drive by the Bush White House to continue to isolating Iran for her refusal in giving up her uranium enrichment program. Twenty seven years after America’s international relations were severed with the Revolutionary Republic of Iran, after the 1979 siege of the US embassy in Tehran by revolutionary zealots, the United States will closed representative office in the Swiss embassy, now recognized by DEBKAfiles as “untenable since Switzerland signed a bi-gas deal with Iran in breach of US sanctions against the Islamic Republic.” Now the United States will open an official office with American diplomats, where Iranians can get visas to travel to the United States and a political half-way step to full diplomatic relations and building a new American embassy in Iran.
The presence of Under-Secretary William Burns as he joined European Union’s Javier Solana meeting with officials of the six powers with Iran’s nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, also confirmed that President George W. Bush has now begun the process of removing or distancing himself from the international policies of the Nation of Israel that called for the curtailment if Iran’s drive for a nuclear bomb by any means, including a nuclear first strike retaliation.
By this backdoor political track, America has negotiated a working relationship with Iranian Revolutionary Guards intelligence officers serving under cover in Iraq to share intelligence and restrain the radical Shi’ite militias from attacking US forces. While the official American statement, according to the DEBKAfiles report, was that Burns “‘will be there (at the big power talks in Switzerland) to listen, not negotiate,” according to intelligence sources, “The real negotiations are going forward steadily in the realms of secret diplomacy.”
Even more ominous to Israel was the signal of the secret rapprochement of America with Tehran and Damascus that left the Olmert government, including Foreign Minister Tzipi LIvni and Defense Minister Ehud Barak with their Israeli foreign policies bankrupted.
Two days earlier, on July 17, 2008, it was reported from the Russia’s Foreign Ministry office that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made an “unexpected” call to the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov of which she informed him of a new “secret pact” between Iran and the United States.
Secret diplomacy, yes, but “secret pact” it would turn out not to be, at least not for awhile. But the secret diplomatic pathway only demonstrated how trapped the Bush White House had become. For nineteen months since the Baker-Hamilton Iraq-Study Group in December 2006, President George W. Bush had sought to achieve his lasting legacy while appeasing the “hawks” and the “doves” between Vice President Richard Cheney with the Office of the Vice President and the Jewish Neo-Cons, against the Rice State Department and the Council on Foreign Relations. We remind ourselves of the Lord of hosts sitting in derision as He watches the nations of this earth plot against His people, His “Land”, and against His most favorite Zion, Jerusalem.
Zechariah 12:2 – “Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of drunkenness to all the surrounding peoples, when they lay siege against Judah and Jerusalem. And it shall happen in that day that I will make Jerusalem a very heavy stone for all peoples; all who would heave it away will surely be cut in pieces, though all nations of the earth are gathered against it.
Gogu-Magog War completes its Seventh Year (2007-8)
The War of Gog and Magog
Gog of the Land of Magog
Who is Rosh, Meshekh and Tubal?
Where is Magog?
The Mongols and the Golden Horde
The Mystery of Magog, one of Japheth’s fourteen descendants
The New World Order Conquers the Land of Magog
The Identification of Mogog by the Great Jewish Mystic Sages
Mogog according to the Esteemed Mystic, Rabbi Issac Luria of Safed, Israel
“Place from the Far North”
“Go Up” to the Land of Israel
The “Apple of God’s Eye”
Israel as the Navel of the Earth
The “North” from the Perspective of the Torah
The Biblical North as the “Place of all Evil”
The Religious “North” and the “South”
the Land of Magog, now the Occupier of the Land of Babylon
The Identification of Gog by Mystical Judaism
Who is the Gog of America, the Land of Magog
Is George Bush for or against the Land of Israel?
A Message by the God of Israel to President George Bush
The Chassidim – The Gog-Magog War was the Holocaust
Postlude – Bush as GogUMogog meets the President of Mongolia
The Rabbinic Translations of the Prophets of Israel on the Battles against Israel at the Time of the End
The Prophet Ezekiel
The Prophet Joel
The Prophet Obadiah
The Prophet Zechariah
The Prophet Daniel
Go to Section One –
“There are Powers at Work – Power so Organized,..Watchful,..Complete!”
2008-2015 – Sabbatical Week of Years to Inter-connect all Nations into a One World Order
World Leaders line up for Conversions to Catholicism and Solidarity to the Vatican
The Division of England by the European Union
The American Presidency, the Religious Right and the National Prayer Breakfast
The Roots of “The Fellowship”
Dominion Theology and the Prayer Breakfast Movement – The Blueprint for Literal Christian World Domination
The Council on National Policy and the Religious Right Military
“Onward Christian Soldiers” – Global Dominionism with the “Christian Army of God”
Forced “Christianization” of American Military Troops
Go to Section Two –
Targeted Pulsed EMP Attack against England’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s Plane
French President Nicholas Sarkozy targeted by Assassins in Israel
Putin warned at NATO Summit Meeting – “Join Us as we go to War”
American B-1B Lancer Bomber taken down on Reputed Iran Attack
Nuclear Explosion as escaping American B-25 Bomber Downed
President Bush declares his Allegiance to the Pope
“War” in the White House and the Death of a Jesuit National Media Giant
Israel Prepares to Go Alone against Iran
Go to Section Three –
An Antiquark Spree causing a Volcanic Explosion in Chili, and a Catastrophic Earthquake in China
Seeking to “Become like God” and Control the Powers of Nature
CERN’s Tensor Transformer Experiment Destabilizes Earth’s Orbit
Devastating Earthquake in China – The “Horn” begins to Break
Was a HAARP Attack Timed to Coincide with the “Anti-Quark Spree Accident”?
Epicenter of China Earthquake - a Nuclear Explosion in a Large Military Armory
CERN’s Experiment to Create a Black Hole
The Philadelphia and Nazi Bell Experiments Revisited
HAARP Bending Time and Space to Destroy Spy Satellite Lost in Covert War with Israel
Warnings of Military Use of Weapons for Secret Warfare and Weather Modification
Sanhedrin Famine Cycle
Israeli Confirmation of Impending Global Famine
America’s Floods in the Mid-West ordered by Chinese 4 Billion Watt Radar
China Retaliates by Seeking to Shut Down the Waters to the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers
Battles over Divine Vision – Bush vs Ahmadinejad
Drought in America
The Mongolia Connection in the Iran, Russia, and China Axis
The Prophetic Fall of the Oriental East
Go to Section Four –
Global Environmental Collapse
The Disappearing Honey Bee
The “Flight” of the Honey Bee – Sonically Induced
Mysterious Bat Syndrome
Moose Populations near Extinction in Genetically Modified Growing Region
In a World of Famine, Genetically Modified Food introduced into World Markets
World Leaders warn of Starvation, Rioting, and Geopolitical Catastrophes
The Rapid Rise of Food Commodities
The Role of Exotic Weapons in the Covert Wars of World Domination
Using HAARP in the Cyclone Nargis and the Devastation of Myanmar (Burma)
The Path of HAARP and CERN leads to China’s Earthquake
The World is Asleep as the Days of Noah Return
The Rise of the Dark Forces of the World Planetary Order
The Rise of Greater Israel and the Restored Houses of Judah and Israel
Go to Section Five –
The Power Brokers of the Quartet of Globalist Nations
The Bush White House taken Over by the Council of Foreign Relations
The Nations Rage and Plot against the Lord and His Anointed People
The Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group Destructive Council against Israel
The “Seek and Destroy” Surge begins with High Level Military Reassignment
The Battle for Baghdad No. 2 Begins as the Mahdi Army goes Underground
The Palestinians Unwanted and Pawns of the Iranian Shi’ite Muslims
American Raiders at Irbil – Number 3 Commander of the Revolutionary Guard Captured
The Bush Pentagon Shake-Up – Robert Gates assumes power as Secretary of Defense
Good Cop, Bad Cop, Bush White House Plots a Divided Course of War and Diplomacy
A Defensive Putin restarts the Cold War Spy Plane Confrontations
President Putin orders Invasion of Georgia along the Caspian Sea
The United States Navy surrounds China and Iran
American Shadow Government goes Underground
Bush’s Knesset Speech Lauding Israel’s 60th Birthday
Bilderbergers Warn as America and Russia Prepare for Global War
Bush and the European Heads of State Flock to Israel
Bush, the Bilderbergs, and the CFR move to Confront Iran
Iran has Nuclear Weapons, Cruise Missiles and Russia did Not give it to Them – Directly
The State of Emergency in America at the Beginning of the next Sabbatical Week of Years (2008-2015)
One Super Intelligence Agency now Over Global America
Bush in Secret Diplomacy with Iran
Go to Section Six –
Bush and Putin’s Final Hour
The Caspian Oil Connection
America Abandons Israel
United States Prepares for Nuclear War as American Armada Heads to Iran
Preparation for the Final Global Battle between the Persian Ram and the Grecian He-Goat
Georgia Invades the Breakaway Provinces of South Ossetia, Russia Invades Georgia
Putin Orders Destruction of American Armada in the Persian Gulf
Russia invades Georgia – Is this the Final Battle between Ram and the He-Goat?
Ethnic Cleansing or Genocide, Georgia Files Lawsuit against Russia
America Asserts her Global Authority
A “Cold War” of Words and Threats between Bush, Russia, and NATO
Russia and the Caucasus – a Political World in Turmoil
Go to Section Seven –
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert – The Fate of Israel in the Hands of Israel’s most Corrupt Politician
The Corruption Scandals of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
Israel is Owned by the Council of Foreign Relations
Israel is Ruled by Freemasons
Peace, Peace – Its time to give away the Golan Heights, Shebaa Farms, Half of Jerusalem, the Water in Galilee and Israel
Hezbollah again in Control of Lebanon
Hezbollah now Officially a Nation
Assad’s Second in Command Assassinated while Syria returns to the International Scene as Broker of Peace
Bush’s Patience Wearing Thin on Iran – Military Blockade and Sanctions Begins
Iran and Syria Celebrate the Collapse of the Fourth Round of Western Sanctions
Go to Section Eight –
9th of Av, 2008 – The Israeli Equation in Russia’s Invasion of Georgia
The Russian Aftermath of the Russian-Georgian War
The Western World’s Response to Russia
Russia Breaks all Ties with the West
Germany’s Chancellor Merkel’s Strange Silence
The Black Sea confrontation between the East and the West
Russia now in Possession of US Intelligence Equipment
9th of Av 2008 brings a Flurry of Peace Proposals
Hezbollah is Ready for Revenge
Hamas ready to take back Jerusalem with Jihad
Iran Woos Bush – Bush Ponders his Destiny
Israel Isolated by the United States
Israel Braces for a War of Annihilation
Will Israel Attack Iran?
The Rise of a New Israel
The Globalist Red Internationale Axis –
Greater Mongolian Dynasty of Russia, China and Persia of Daniel’s “Ram with Two Great Horns”
Go to Section One –
Saladin and the Christian Crusades, a Prelude to the Mongolian Invasion of Persia
The Shi’ite Muslim incitement of the First Crusade
The First Christian Crusade
The Crusader Siege of Damascus
Edessa and the Manylion, the Image of Jesus
The Saladin of History
The Military Genius of Saladin
Saladin and the Legends of Baalbeck
The Jewish Messiahs in the Age of Saladin and the Crusaders
Saladin and the Sunni Ayyubid Dynasty of Egypt
The Final Years of Saladin’s Ayyubid Egyptian Dynasty
The Crusader Christian Kings of Jerusalem
Saladin’s Ayyubid Sultanate of Egypt
Go to Section Two –
The Vision of Daniel at Shushan
The First Horn of the Ram – The Union of Soviet Socialist Republic
The Second Horn of the Ram – The People’s Republic of China
Xinhai Revolution – the End of the Manchurian Mongol Dynasty of China
The Great Wall of China
The Mongolian Empire of Genghis Khan and the Chinese Invasion
The Death of Genghis Khan and the Division of the Mongolian Empire
The Four Kingdoms of the Greater Mongolia Empire
Ögedei Khan, the second Great Khan of the Greater Mongolian Empire
The Death of Ögedei Khan the Second Great Khan of the Mongols
Güyük Khan the Third Great Khan of the Mongols and its Affects on the European Invasion
Möngke Khan (1251-1259) the Fourth Great Khan of Mongolia
Sartaq Khan of the Golden Horde and Alexander Nevsky the Grand Prince of Novgorod
Go to Section Three –
The Mongolian Il-Khanate in Persia
The Rise of the Hulegu Khan and the Il-Khanate of Persia
The Ismaili Hashshashin, the Islamic Assassins
The March to Baghdad by the Mongolian – Christian Crusader Alliance
The Battle of Baghdad by Hülegü Khan
The Affect of the Mongolian Invasion upon the Jews
Go to Section Four –
The Four Rival Kingdoms of Alexander’s Grecian Empire
The Four Rival Kingdoms of Genghis Khan’s Mongolian Empire
The Four Khanates of the Greater Mongolian Empire
The Yuan Mongolian Dynasty of Kublai Khan in China
Tamerlane and the Mongol Invasion into Palestine and the Middle East
The International Effect of the Mongolian Invasions
The Nephrite Jade Khasbuu Dynastic Seal and the Manchurian Dynasty
The Final Days of the Russian Khanate and the Rise of the Mucovite and the Russian Empire
The Mongolian Legacy and the Battle for Jerusalem
The Return of the Biblical House of Judah and the Prophetic Cycles of War
Daniel 8 “Ram” and the “He-Goat” War Cycle –
“The Epic War of Civilizations between the Western Golden Internationale and the Eastern Red International”
Go to Part One –
Go to Part Two –
Go to Part Three –
“The Rise of Israel and the Ancient Empires of the Bible” –
“Labor Zionist Israel, Imperial Islam, and Imperial Babylon and Persia”
Go to Part Four –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Go to Section Three –
Go to Section Four –
Go to Section Five –
“The Globalist Mongolian Red Internationale Axis” –
“Greater Mongolian Dynasty Axis of Russia, China, and Persia-Iran”
Go to Part Five –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Section Three –
Section Four –
“The Age of Imperial Persia and the Islamic Caliphates” –
“The Influence of the Persian Empire upon Islamic Caliphates and Shi’ite Iran” –
Go to Part Six –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Section Three –
“The Sanhedrin Commentary” –
“The Last Seven Years before the Coming of the Messiah”
Go to Part Seven –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Go to Section Three –
Go to Section Four –
Go to Section Five –
Go to Section Six –
Go to Section Seven –
Go to Section Eight –
“The Globalist Economic Golden Internationale” –
“Golden Internationale’s Bid for World Domination”
Go to Part Eight –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Go to Section Three –
“The Ezekiel 38-39 GoguMogog War Cycle” –
“GoguMogog War completes its Seventh Year (2007-2008)”
Go to Part Nine –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Go to Section Three –
Go to Section Four –
Go to Section Five –
Go to Section Six –
Go to Section Seven –
Go to Section Eight –
“The Globalist Black Internationale” –
“The Vatican and the Black Pope”
Go to Part Ten –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Go to Section Three –
Go to Section Four –
Go to Section Five –
“The Coming of the Messiah son of Joseph and the Messiah son of David” –
“The Jewish Expectations for the Coming of the Messiah” –
Go to Part Eleven –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Go to Section Three –
Go to Section Four –
Go to Section Five –
“The Coming of the Islamic Mahdi (Messiah)” –
“The Islamic Expectations for the Coming of the Mahdi (Messiah)” –
Go to Part Twelve –
Go to Section One –
Go to Section Two –
Go to Section Three –
Message from BibleSearchers
BibleSearchers scans the world for information that has relevance on the time of the end. It is our prayer that this will allow the believers in the Almighty One of Israel to “watch and be ready”. Our readiness has nothing to do trying to halt the progression of evil on our planet earth. In our readiness, we seek to be prepared for the coming of the Messiah of Israel so that goodness and evil will be manifested in its fullest. Our preparation is a pathway of spiritual readiness for a world of peace. Our defender is the Lord of hosts. The time of the end suggests that the Eternal One of Israel’s intent is to close out this chapter of earth’s history so that the perpetrators of evil, those that seek power, greed and control, will be eliminated from this planet earth. The wars of the heavens are being played out on this planet earth and humans will live through it to testify of the might, power, justice and the love of the God of Israel. In a world of corruption and disinformation, we cannot always know what the historical truth is and who is promoting evil or mis-information. We cannot guarantee our sources but we will always seek to portray trends that can be validated in the Torah and the testimony of the prophets of the Old and the New Testament.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml